You stop competing on price as a managed service provider (MSP) by
changing what you’re actually selling: from infrastructure coverage that
any competitor can quote against, to measurable business outcomes built
on top of the systems you already manage. That means quantifying value
in every client conversation instead of listing tasks, packaging
automation and AI work as its own recurring line item instead of a
one-time project, and picking a specialty deep enough that a rival’s
lower quote isn’t really comparable anymore. A better sales script won’t
get you there, and neither will a bigger discount. It happens by
changing what’s on the invoice.
Why Does
Every MSP Renewal Turn Into a Price Fight?
Because most MSPs are selling the same thing. Patching, backup, help
desk, remote monitoring: it’s the same stack, wrapped in a different
logo, and a client comparing three quotes for identical coverage has
exactly one rational way to choose. Price.
This isn’t a sign you’re doing something wrong. It’s the state of the
industry. The Service Leadership Index for Q4 2024 put worldwide managed
services revenue growth at just 1.0% for the quarter, and North America
at 0.2%, with average adjusted EBITDA sitting at 11.1% and 18% of MSPs
reporting outright losses (ConnectWise).
Project and professional services margins are getting hit even harder,
falling from 23% in Q4 2023 to 12.9% in Q4 2024 in that same report.
When a whole industry’s margins move in the same direction, the problem
is the model, not any one owner’s sales team.
Why Doesn’t a Better
Sales Pitch Fix It?
Because the pitch isn’t the problem. If the service behind the pitch
is identical to three other vendors’ service, you’re not solving a
messaging problem, you’re solving a product problem, and no script fixes
a product problem. A prospect who can put your proposal next to a
competitor’s and see the same line items in a different font is going to
negotiate on the one variable left: your rate.
Sales training gets sold as the answer because it’s the cheapest
thing to buy. It’s also the thing least likely to work if what you’re
selling hasn’t changed.
Why Doesn’t
Discounting Just Buy You the Renewal?
It buys you one renewal, and it costs you every one after that.
Discount once under pressure and you’ve told the client your price was
never really your price. Next year they ask again, and now you’re
negotiating from a lower floor with margins that were already thin. The
Service Leadership data for Q2 2024 put average managed service gross
margin at 46.2% (ConnectWise).
That’s before overhead, before payroll, before anything else hits the
P&L. There isn’t much room in that number to keep giving pieces of
it away every renewal cycle.
Discounting also doesn’t fix the reason you were asked to discount.
The client still can’t tell what makes you different, so next year
you’re back at the same table having the same conversation.
What Actually Stops the
Price Fight?
Selling outcomes instead of coverage. Not “we manage your
infrastructure,” but something like “we cut your invoice processing time
by 80%” or “we caught the anomaly that would have cost you a week of
downtime.” Those numbers are made up to show the shape of it, but
outcomes like them are specific to what you did for that client, so they
can’t be shopped against a generic quote.
This is already showing up in the data. In Kaseya’s 2025 Global MSP
Benchmark Report, 67% of MSPs named security as one of their five
fastest-growing revenue categories, and the MSPs earning net margins of
15% or higher were the ones ranking security among their top three
revenue streams (Kaseya).
Security sells better than general infrastructure because it’s framed as
an outcome (staying out of a breach) rather than a task (patching a
server). The same report found 64% of MSPs say their clients want
guidance on best practices beyond just the tools themselves, which tells
you clients are already asking for the advisory, outcome-based
relationship. Most MSPs just aren’t set up to sell it yet.
We’ve written before about why this pressure keeps building even when
your utilization numbers look fine: why MSP margins
keep shrinking covers the mechanics behind the squeeze in more
depth.
How
Do You Quantify Value So the Renewal Isn’t a Negotiation?
You put numbers in front of the client that they can’t get from
anyone else, and you do it in a quarterly business review (QBR), the
regular check-in meeting where you show a client what their spend has
actually bought them. Most QBRs fail here. They list uptime percentage
and ticket counts, which is activity, not value. A client reading “99.9%
uptime” doesn’t feel anything, because nothing happened. Nothing
happening is the baseline they already assume they’re paying for.
Compare that to a number tied to their business. As an illustration:
a workflow you automated that used to take a client’s team six hours a
week now takes forty minutes. That’s the line that goes in the QBR, not
“we kept your servers patched.” One is a task you performed. The other
is money and time you gave back. Once a client can see that number every
quarter, the renewal conversation stops being about your rate card and
starts being about what you’re going to find them next.
How Do
You Package Automation as a Recurring Line Item?
You stop treating it as a project and start treating it as a
subscription. Build the workflow once, then bill for the monitoring, the
tuning, and the improvements to it every month, the same way you already
bill for monitoring the rest of a client’s stack. That’s what turns a
one-time automation build into monthly recurring revenue (MRR):
predictable income that renews itself instead of income you have to
re-sell from scratch every time.
This is also the piece that’s hardest for a competitor to undercut,
because there’s nothing to compare it to. A flat “$150 per user”
infrastructure quote is easy to shop. “We automated your onboarding
workflow and we keep improving it every month” isn’t, because the
competitor would have to build the same specific thing for the same
specific client to even bid on it.
How Do
You Pick a Specialty a Competitor Can’t Undercut?
You go narrow enough that generalists can’t follow you in. A vertical
(healthcare billing, law firm intake, dental scheduling) or a workflow
(accounts payable, client onboarding, compliance reporting) that you
know cold, deep enough to spot the specific automation and AI
opportunities inside it that a generalist MSP would walk right past.
That depth is the moat. Anyone can quote “managed IT.” Almost nobody can
quote something as specific as cutting denial rates on insurance claims
by automating the intake step, because almost nobody has actually built
that for a client in that vertical.
Pick one you can defend with real work, not one you picked because it
sounded good in a deck.
What’s
a Realistic First Step If You’re Starting From Zero?
Pick one client, one process, one number. Don’t try to rebuild your
whole service catalog before you’ve proven the model works once. Find a
workflow that’s clearly wasting time or money for a client you already
trust, build the automation, measure the before-and-after, and put that
number in their next QBR. That single proof point is worth more than a
rebrand.
Some people describe the destination of this shift as becoming a
Managed Intelligence Provider (MIP): an MSP that’s added a data,
workflow, and AI layer on top of the infrastructure it already runs, so
the client is buying outcomes instead of coverage. It’s a maturity
stage, not a rebrand you announce on day one, and it’s the path MIPLY
works with MSP owners to build, one packaged outcome at a time, inside a
peer community of owners doing the same thing (The Guild) rather than
figuring it out alone.
The demand side of this is real too. Small business adoption of
generative AI jumped to 58%, up from 40% the year before, according to
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Empowering Small Business report, and 82%
of the small businesses already using AI grew their workforce over the
prior year rather than shrinking it (U.S.
Chamber of Commerce). Your clients are already spending on AI
somewhere. The only question is whether they’re spending it with you or
with someone else.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do MSPs stop competing on price? MSPs stop
competing on price by selling outcomes instead of interchangeable
infrastructure coverage. That means quantifying results in hours or
dollars during quarterly business reviews, packaging automation and AI
work as a recurring line item rather than a one-time project, and
specializing deep enough in one workflow or vertical that a competitor’s
flat quote isn’t really comparable.
What is value-based pricing for an MSP? Value-based
pricing ties what a managed service provider (MSP) charges to the
business result a service produces, not the hours or tickets behind it.
Instead of billing by device or user, you price around what the work is
worth to the client, like time saved or errors prevented, which is why
it survives a competitor’s lower flat quote.
How do you show clients the value of managed IT
services? You translate technical work into business numbers
inside a quarterly business review (QBR): hours saved, incidents
prevented, revenue protected, not just uptime percentages. Clients renew
on outcomes they can see, not activity logs. If the only thing in the
QBR is “nothing broke,” the client has no real reason not to shop your
renewal.
What is a Managed Intelligence Provider (MIP)? A
Managed Intelligence Provider (MIP) is a managed service provider (MSP)
that has added a data, workflow, and AI layer on top of the
infrastructure it already manages, so it sells measurable business
outcomes instead of just uptime and support. It’s a maturity stage MSPs
grow into, not a rebrand, and it’s the path MIPLY teaches MSP owners to
build toward.
This Might Not Be for You
If your team is buried in tickets with zero slack, this isn’t a
weekend fix. Building even one outcome-based service, proving it with a
real client, and packaging it so it can be sold repeatably takes real
hours from people who don’t have spare ones. If you’re not willing to
protect a few hours a week for a quarter to build and prove one packaged
outcome before you try to roll it out further, don’t start. Half-built
offers that never get sold are worse than no offer at all, because they
cost you the time without changing a single renewal conversation.
The Payoff
Pick one client, one workflow, one number you can put in front of
them next quarter. Build it, measure it, show it. Do that once and
you’ve already broken the price fight with that client, because their
next renewal conversation isn’t about your rate card anymore. It’s about
what you did for them last quarter, and what you’re going to find them
next.
Recent Comments